cause Google is so poor that they can't offer money????? what the heck.. sigh. Out of all the companies I would have thought google was better then that.
I bring stuff like this up at least once a month..People in general think that art shouldn't cost them anything.
I posted a bit back on Facebook about someone who requested a tattoo from me. I asked for a small donation for my time (only $5-10), since the project was going to take me about 5 hours and it'd makes it easier to work on something in my free time knowing that I'm making a bit off of it. She threw down the exposure card. Really? Exposure on dA (high school students and college kids) and wherever you hide it on your body? Can I get my logo tattooed underneath the final product?
What's almost worse is that artists undercut each other. If someone is offering a job for $100 and you say you'll do it for $50, and it requires a lot of time, you're not making money. What you're doing is telling the consumer that they can have a bidding war so that they're the only ones that win. The same was the case in this google deal where some artists showed they'd do it for the exposure. It might help them personally but it hurts every artist out there that's already underpaid and trying to just get by.
When someone tells me they have someone who will do it for X amount when I will only do it for twice that, I say, "you get what you pay for, if you want crap work and you are comfortable with it on your body for the rest of your life (in the case of a tattoo) or if you want crap work to represent your company or product, that is fine by me. Enjoy your sub-par art."
Yeah, artists get no respect. Always cliental and art collectors don't realize the time and effort it take to create work. They're either always short changing, looking for the cheapest deal, or most, just expecting it to come for free. You'd think a corporation with endlessly deep pockets would take professional respect for such things. Redic. Insulting. Quite troublesome indeed for our profession. Just wrong.
sigh. Out of all the companies I would have thought google was better then that.
I posted a bit back on Facebook about someone who requested a tattoo from me. I asked for a small donation for my time (only $5-10), since the project was going to take me about 5 hours and it'd makes it easier to work on something in my free time knowing that I'm making a bit off of it. She threw down the exposure card. Really? Exposure on dA (high school students and college kids) and wherever you hide it on your body? Can I get my logo tattooed underneath the final product?
What's almost worse is that artists undercut each other. If someone is offering a job for $100 and you say you'll do it for $50, and it requires a lot of time, you're not making money. What you're doing is telling the consumer that they can have a bidding war so that they're the only ones that win. The same was the case in this google deal where some artists showed they'd do it for the exposure. It might help them personally but it hurts every artist out there that's already underpaid and trying to just get by.
They're either always short changing, looking for the cheapest deal, or most, just expecting it to come for free.
You'd think a corporation with endlessly deep pockets would take professional respect for such things.
Redic. Insulting. Quite troublesome indeed for our profession. Just wrong.